<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Microvm on iMil.net</title>
    <link>http://imil.net/blog/tags/microvm/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Microvm on iMil.net</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:18:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://imil.net/blog/tags/microvm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Build A MMIO Booting Debian VM Out Of Cloud Images</title>
      <link>http://imil.net/blog/posts/2025/not-so-smol-debian/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:18:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://imil.net/blog/posts/2025/not-so-smol-debian/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As you might be aware of, I am working on a minimal &lt;em&gt;BSD/UNIX&lt;/em&gt; system called &lt;a href=&#34;https://smolBSD.org&#34;&gt;smolBSD&lt;/a&gt;. It is based on the &lt;a href=&#34;https://NetBSD.org&#34;&gt;NetBSD&lt;/a&gt; operating system, and its main target is virtual machines, more specifically &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.qemu.org/docs/master/system/i386/microvm.html&#34;&gt;microvm&lt;/a&gt;s. This system is capable of fully booting the OS in less than one second using a specially trimmed kernel along with small, specialized root systems.&lt;br&gt;&#xA;I was stunned to learn (but am I wrong?) that this work does not seem to have an equivalent, not even in the Linux world. &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.freebsd.org/status/report-2022-07-2022-09/firecracker/&#34;&gt;FreeBSD Firecracker support&lt;/a&gt; sure permits to boot a kernel is about the same time my &lt;a href=&#34;https://github.com/NetBSD/src/compare/trunk...NetBSDfr:NetBSD-src:nbfr_master&#34;&gt;NetBSD hacked kernel&lt;/a&gt; does, but there&amp;rsquo;s no work around s slim and task dedicated root filesystem.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fakecracker: NetBSD as a Function Based MicroVM</title>
      <link>http://imil.net/blog/posts/2020/fakecracker-netbsd-as-a-function-based-microvm/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 06:21:35 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>http://imil.net/blog/posts/2020/fakecracker-netbsd-as-a-function-based-microvm/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In November 2018 &lt;a href=&#34;https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/opensource/firecracker-open-source-secure-fast-microvm-serverless/&#34;&gt;AWS published an Open Source tool called Firecracker&lt;/a&gt;, mostly a virtual machine monitor relying on &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Main_Page&#34;&gt;KVM&lt;/a&gt;, a small sized Linux kernel, and a stripped down version of &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.qemu.org/&#34;&gt;Qemu&lt;/a&gt;. What baffled me was the speed at which the virtual machine would fire up and run the service. The whole process is to be compared to a &lt;em&gt;container&lt;/em&gt;, but safer, as it does not share the kernel nor any resource, it is a separate and dedicated virtual machine.&lt;br&gt;&#xA;If you want to learn more on &lt;em&gt;Firecracker&lt;/em&gt;&amp;rsquo;s internals, &lt;a href=&#34;https://unixism.net/2019/10/how-aws-firecracker-works-a-deep-dive/&#34;&gt;here&amp;rsquo;s a very well put article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
